Today, the IRS issued Notice 2014-19,
which provides guidance on how qualified retirement plans should treat
the marriages of same-sex couples following the Supreme Court’s decision
in United States v. Windsor . The Windsor
decision invalidated Section 3 of the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act
(DOMA) that barred married same-sex couples from being treated as
married under federal law.
The notice:
Following the Windsor decision, the IRS issued Revenue Ruling 2013-17, which holds that married same-sex couples are now treated as married for all federal tax purposes where marriage is a factor, if the couple is lawfully married under the laws of one of the 50 states, the District of Columbia, a U.S. territory or a foreign jurisdiction. Notice 2014-19 gives additional guidance on how qualified retirement plans should treat the marriages of same-sex couples.
Plan amendments required with respect to plan provisions inconsistent with Windsor
See the FAQs on the treatment of same-sex marriages for additional guidance, including:
The notice:
- gives examples of Code requirements under which the marital status of the participants is relevant to the payment of benefits,
- provides guidance on how to satisfy those requirements in light of Windsor and
Revenue Ruling 2013-17 , and - describes when retirement plans must be amended to comply with Windsor, Revenue Ruling 2013-17, and Notice 2014-19
Following the Windsor decision, the IRS issued Revenue Ruling 2013-17, which holds that married same-sex couples are now treated as married for all federal tax purposes where marriage is a factor, if the couple is lawfully married under the laws of one of the 50 states, the District of Columbia, a U.S. territory or a foreign jurisdiction. Notice 2014-19 gives additional guidance on how qualified retirement plans should treat the marriages of same-sex couples.
Plan amendments required with respect to plan provisions inconsistent with Windsor
- If its terms are inconsistent with Windsor or Revenue Ruling 2013-17, a retirement plan must be amended to comply with Windsor and Revenue Ruling 2013-17. For example, a plan must be amended if it defines “spouse” by reference to section 3 of DOMA, or only as a person of the opposite sex.
- Not all plans need to be amended in order to be in compliance. An amendment generally is not required if a plan’s terms are not inconsistent with Windsor or with Revenue Ruling 2013-17.
- Required amendments must be adopted by the later
of December 31, 2014, or the applicable date under the IRS’ general
amendment guidance for qualified retirement plans,
Revenue Procedure 2007-44 .
- Plan sponsors may also, but are not required to, reflect the outcome of Windsor for periods prior to the date Windsor was decided.
- In such a case, a plan amendment is required.
- Such optional amendment must be adopted by the later of December 31, 2014, or the applicable date under Revenue Procedure 2007-44.
See the FAQs on the treatment of same-sex marriages for additional guidance, including:
- beneficiary designations in profit-sharing plans after Windsor,
- amendments that reflect the outcome of Windsor for periods before the decision was issued, and
- application of the outcome of Windsor to 403(b) plans.
- IRS News - For Same-Sex Couples and Certain Domestic Partners
- Revenue Ruling 2013-17 – treatment of same-sex marriage for federal tax purposes
- FAQs on treatment of same-sex marriage for retirement plans
For additional information contact a business lawyer at the law offices of AttorneyBritt.
IRS Circular 230 Disclosure:
To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform
you that any
tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments)
is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the
purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue
Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any
transaction or matter addressed herein.
No comments:
Post a Comment